unimore/kernel-hacking-2024-linux-steffo
unimore/kernel-hacking-2024-linux-steffo
1
Fork 0
Code Pull requests 5 Wiki Activity

regulator: s5m8767: Properly handle gpio_request failure

Browse source 
Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code.

This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure, we should return error
when gpio_request fails rather than just show warning.

I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free
gpios in s5m8767_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module.

Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns error,
the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck_gpios
and buck_ds gpios. This looks wrong to me.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Axel Lin 2012-07-05 23:12:49 +08:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 8fa25eda86
commit 5febb3c9d5
1 changed files with 22 additions and 23 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

45
drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
View file

@ -620,20 +620,21 @@ static __devinit int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck_gpios[0]) &&
gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck_gpios[1]) &&
gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck_gpios[2])) {
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_gpios[0], "S5M8767 SET1");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
" for SET1\n");
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_gpios[0],
"S5M8767 SET1");
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_gpios[1], "S5M8767 SET2");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
" for SET2\n");
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_gpios[1],
"S5M8767 SET2");
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_gpios[2],
"S5M8767 SET3");
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_gpios[2], "S5M8767 SET3");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
" for SET3\n");
/* SET1 GPIO */
gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck_gpios[0],
(s5m8767->buck_gpioindex >> 2) & 0x1);
@ -643,25 +644,23 @@ static __devinit int s5m8767_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* SET3 GPIO */
gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck_gpios[2],
(s5m8767->buck_gpioindex >> 0) & 0x1);
ret = 0;
} else {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "GPIO NOT VALID\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
return ret;
}
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_ds[0], "S5M8767 DS2");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request for DS2\n");
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_ds[0], "S5M8767 DS2");
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_ds[1], "S5M8767 DS3");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request for DS3\n");
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_ds[1], "S5M8767 DS3");
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck_ds[2], "S5M8767 DS4");
if (ret == -EBUSY)
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request for DS4\n");
ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck_ds[2], "S5M8767 DS4");
if (ret)
return ret;
/* DS2 GPIO */
gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck_ds[0], 0x0);