From eb30a7a5c88f65d06c35c2268af0075c0d6d803e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miquel Raynal Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:35:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mac802154: Clarify an expression While going through the whole interface opening logic in my head I was consistently bothered by the condition checking whether there was only one interface of type NODE/COORD opened at the same time. What actually bothered me was the fact that in one case we would use the wpan_dev pointer directly while in the other case we would use the sdata pointer, making it harder to differentiate both. In practice the condition should be straightforward to read. IMHO dropping the wpan_dev indirection allows to clarify the check. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Acked-by: Alexander Aring Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221026093502.602734-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt --- net/mac802154/iface.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac802154/iface.c b/net/mac802154/iface.c index d9b50884d34e..f21132dd82cf 100644 --- a/net/mac802154/iface.c +++ b/net/mac802154/iface.c @@ -254,7 +254,6 @@ ieee802154_check_concurrent_iface(struct ieee802154_sub_if_data *sdata, enum nl802154_iftype iftype) { struct ieee802154_local *local = sdata->local; - struct wpan_dev *wpan_dev = &sdata->wpan_dev; struct ieee802154_sub_if_data *nsdata; /* we hold the RTNL here so can safely walk the list */ @@ -267,7 +266,7 @@ ieee802154_check_concurrent_iface(struct ieee802154_sub_if_data *sdata, * exist really an use case if we need to support * multiple node types at the same time. */ - if (wpan_dev->iftype == NL802154_IFTYPE_NODE && + if (sdata->wpan_dev.iftype == NL802154_IFTYPE_NODE && nsdata->wpan_dev.iftype == NL802154_IFTYPE_NODE) return -EBUSY;