17cf22c33e
The expressions tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns and task_active_pid_ns aka ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) should have the same number of cache line misses with the practical difference that ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk)) is released later in a processes life. Furthermore by using task_active_pid_ns it becomes trivial to write an unshare implementation for the the pid namespace. So I have used task_active_pid_ns everywhere I can. In fork since the pid has not yet been attached to the process I use ns_of_pid, to achieve the same effect. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.gitignore | ||
backing_ops.c | ||
context.c | ||
coredump.c | ||
fault.c | ||
file.c | ||
gang.c | ||
hw_ops.c | ||
inode.c | ||
lscsa_alloc.c | ||
Makefile | ||
run.c | ||
sched.c | ||
spu_restore.c | ||
spu_restore_crt0.S | ||
spu_restore_dump.h_shipped | ||
spu_save.c | ||
spu_save_crt0.S | ||
spu_save_dump.h_shipped | ||
spu_utils.h | ||
spufs.h | ||
sputrace.h | ||
switch.c | ||
syscalls.c |